“It’s not over,” say shale gas opponents at Stanley blockade

Written by Tracy Glynn on August 11, 2011

almabelsiStanley/Fredericton – A two-day blockade of SWN Resources’ seismic vibrators on Route 625, a dirt road north of the village of Stanley, ended after supper time on August 10th. Worry of arrest and concern over strategy weighed heavily on the minds of the blockade participants as they discussed whether to continue or halt the blockade. As rain poured down, participants, including many who stayed overnight in tents, were mostly in favour of discontinuing the blockade because they felt they had made their point that the opposition to shale gas in the province of New Brunswick is serious. They planned to take their opposition to the politicians and grow the anti-shale gas movement.

“We should be proud of what we’ve accomplished here today,” said Susan Levi-Peters, former chief of Elsipogtog. “We have come together, natives, francophones and anglophones to oppose this industry.”

An immediate demand of the blockade participants was to have a meeting with Conservative Premier David Alward at the blockade site. The Premier refused. Visiting the blockade in his stead was York North MLA Kirk MacDonald. Before the announcement that MacDonald was on his way to the blockade, the shale gas opponents had already decided in a round circle meeting to discontinue the blockade.

MacDonald arrived at approximately 5:00pm with a bag of food for the blockade participants. He was greeted with a cautious applause by participants. MacDonald was seated next to Maliseet elder Alma Brooks, Sandy Brewer of Stanley and two RCMP negotiators. Over 50 blockade participants gathered around them while about another 50 milled around the blockade site.

Brooks argued her case with MacDonald. She spoke of the importance of protecting the water and warned, “We had 1,500 people last time on the streets in Fredericton. We will be 10,000 or more next time.”

“How do you drink gas polluted water?” asked one of the Stanley blockade participants.

“I have been taking your concerns to government,” responded MacDonald. “People are taking time to research and become experts on this issue.”

alma-kirk-sm

MacDonald’s ongoing meetings with some of the opponents was noted while his counterparts, the government ministers responsible for oversight of the shale gas industry, Minister of Environment Margaret-Ann Blaney and Minister of Natural Resources Bruce Northrup, were criticized for dismissing legitimate concerns and defending the shale gas industry.

Levi-Peters told MacDonald, “We don’t want these machines in Kent County. The companies say they will sue us. We will sue them if they come on Crown land. It’s not their land.” The crowd erupted in cheers and clapping.

“It’s pure pollution and destruction of wilderness,” said Vicki Oland, a woman from Durham Bridge. She was also greeted with applause when she said, “New Brunswick is looking for a new message for its license plates. It should be New Brunswick: a nature’s wonder.”

The drive to the blockade site through picturesque Nashwaak River Valley, a hotbed of shale gas resistance, emboldened the shale gas opponents as they viewed not only the local opposition marked by the number of houses with anti-shale gas signs but also what is at risk–the winding Nashwaak River, tall pines and fields of potatoes, raspberries and goldenrod. “New Brunswick is not Alberta. It’s not a wasteland,” continued Oland.

MacDonald seemed to concur with the crowd’s concerns when he said, “We were able to live thousands of years without oil and gas. We can’t live without water.”

A woman from the crowd responded to MacDonald’s claim that he is taking their message to government, “But are you defending our message?” A man said, “If you go to government and defend us, we’ll defend you! We elected you!” Another man shouted, “Run as an independent!”

In response to MacDonald’s assertions that the government is putting into place regulations for the industry, Brooks said, “There are no guarantees. They’re experimenting. The government can’t control them.”

One man questioned whether the industry wrote the regulations, which mining companies have done in the past in countries like Indonesia and Guatemala. In response to a man calling New Brunswick a third world country, MacDonald said such destructive practices are actually sometimes banned in third world countries. Another man, with tears in his eyes, pleaded with MacDonald to realize that their protest is huge for Stanley, normally a conservative village.

cops-blockade

Moon Joyce, an instructor at Renaissance College in Fredericton, asked MacDonald, “What are the terms of agreement with these companies? What are the lengths of licenses in this area?” MacDonald did not know the answer to these questions and others that followed from the crowd. MacDonald promised to get the answers.

Louise Melanson, a Fredericton teacher, asked MacDonald, “Are we bounded by NAFTA?” The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) includes proportionately clauses over exports such as energy, which many free trade critics say means that New Brunswick could be on the hook for losses incurred by companies if the province decided to reduce the original amount of exports of energy, i.e. shale gas, to the U.S. Companies have also used Chapter 11 of NAFTA to sue jurisdictions for losses in profits. Melanson is left wondering whether SWN Resources from the U.S. could sue New Brunswick if the province chose to ban or regulate the industry. She said, “It is better to cut our losses now so we don’t lose our water.”

A resident of the rolling hills of Nashwaak River Valley asked, “How close can seismic work come to our rivers, streams and brooks?” MacDonald said, “every home and water well is protected by a 200 metre set back.” MacDonald said that the Taymouth Community Association has been successful in getting the Department of Natural Resources to agree to have a government official and a community representative monitor each test site as they are installed. He said the work will also be videotaped.

An employee of NB Power told MacDonald of his concerns with the impacts of seismic work on NB Power stations and sub-stations. He said that their facilities are insulated in porcelain and they have concrete foundations. He said that the problem has not been resolved at NB Power safety committee meetings.

Milda Titford, a resident of Stanley, demanded a position from MacDonald–yes or no to shale gas. MacDonald said he represents the people and shares the opponents’ questions on the impacts of the industry but refused to say that he will oppose the industry.

Brooks ended the meeting by thanking the community of Stanley for donating food for their gathering. Billy’s Restaurant in Stanley, with an anti-shale gas sign in their yard, collected donations for food provisions for the blockade. “The community of Stanley has cooked supper for us. We will share this food and it will make us stronger,” said Brooks. After inviting MacDonald to join their supper, Brooks turned to MacDonald and said, “We’ll see you at the Legislature.”

On August 11th, the day after the blockade, shale gas opponents gathered in front of and inside the lobby area of the Centennial Building on King Street in Fredericton. Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup met briefly with the demonstrators in the afternoon including Alma Brooks who reminded him that First Nations in the province have not been consulted on shale gas and of the province’s obligations to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The meeting ended with calls of shame when he cut the meeting short and refused to meet with St. Mary’s Chief Candice Paul.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7lOD2DecZc

bruce-milda-sm

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.