NB Media Co-op

Wednesday
Sep 08th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home New Brunswick Politics Media expert exposes marketing of NB Power sale

Media expert exposes marketing of NB Power sale

E-mail Print PDF
New Brunswickers continue to hold rallies and protests in opposition to the proposed sale of NB Power. Mount Allison professor, Erin Steuter, outlined the marketing techniques that the government to sell the deal to a resistant public. The province of New Brunswick has hired the services of international public relations firm, Hill and Knowlton, to help convince New Brunswickers to support the proposed sale of NB Power to Hydro Quebec. Hill and Knowlton is notorious for its work on a wide variety of unethical campaigns including selling the Gulf War to the American public, disputing the carcinogenicity of cigarettes, and glossing over the missing ballots of the 2004 American election. During a recent conference in Moncton, Mount Allison University professor, Erin Steuter, provided the following account of the marketing strategies that are being used by the government.  

  1. Glittering generalities - Create positive associations with the deal by using glad words that don't have any real meaning: progress, moving forward, opportunity.
  2. Us vs. them - Associate those who raise legitimate concerns with those who believe that Hydro Quebec will tear out the Mactaquac Dam and flood everyone living downriver. Suggest that people who believe anything critical will believe the most far-fetched notions. Bring New Brunswickers onto the side of progress, and those who raise criticism in the category of naysayer. “The government has talked about the various concerns of the people of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland as publicity stunts. There's a real sense that there are 'special interest groups' -- meaning the working people of New Brunswick.”
  3. Double speak - Say that you are trying to create self-sufficiency when in fact the proposed deal would create a dependent and even colonial relationship with Quebec.
  4. Transfer technique - Transfer popular values to the deal whether they fit or not. "In this case there has really been a sort of a greenwashing in which this is supposed to be a good deal for the environment when that's really not the case.”
  5. The false analogy - Compare NB Power’s debt to consumer debt. “The premier has been using the credit card payment analogy and talking about how we can't just keep making these minimum payments forever. It has a resonance of truth with the public because it is true about household debt, but it is not true about the way that the government manages its debt. We know that the utility corporation is in fact paying off its debt while bringing in a profit.”
  6. The testimonial - Bring out Frank McKenna and prominent New Brunswickers who will benefit from this deal to reassure the public. “Of course this has been a very important issue for the Irvings, so the Irvings have come out very strongly in favour of the deal directly and also through the use of their media empire.”
  7. The plain folks technique - Use simplistic language to describe a complex deal. “They've referred to our 'neighbour' Quebec, but we're talking about political actors; we're talking about corporate actors; we're talking about people who have their own vested interests in their own provinces; and those traditions of neighbourliness are completely false in this sense.”
  8. Card stacking - Stack the cards so that the cards that are valuable are at the top and the cards that are less valuable are at the bottom. “They are blatantly saying that this will cause job increases and the Irving papers have certainly echoed that this is going to be a wonderful boon for New Brunswick when it's absolutely clear that there will be significant job losses.”
  9. The false crisis - Fabricate a sense of urgency. “There is a sense that this is dire, that this is urgent, that we're at risk, that we don't have a viable energy industry in this province, that there could be a possible rate shock. Then the government steps in and says ‘given this risky, urgent crisis situation we will come in and provide protection, security shelter.”

 

Time will tell whether New Brunswickers will respond to these marketing techniques, or whether they will look to the facts in order to make up their minds about the proposed deal.

Comments
Please take the time to study the subject you are
collreynolds 2010-01-05 11:52:37

I'll have to assume that you never studied journalism (or even a basic ENGL 101 writing class). You would have received an 'F' for this article. Rule number one: support your statements. Any Journalism student would rip apart your writing. If you can't support your statements, you're credibility is shot.

And how do you criticize the marketing plans of the sale if you have no background that makes you a marketing "expert". Even if you had taken interest in marketing as a hobbyist, you would have come off better than this. Now if you claimed to be a scientist who argued the merits of the effects of the sale on our environment, maybe you would sound credible. You should stick to what you know. I'm sure if you made any effort at all, you could have found atleast one person in marketing to bounce your ideas off before writing.

It constantly amazes me how little concern so called experts have for their own credibility and, even worse, how few people in NB seem to insist that information comes from credible sources. That's probably the thing that bothers me the most about this whole debate.

Make any decision you want to about this deal, but PLEASE make it an informed one. Take your economic opinions from economists, take your scientific opinions from scientists and take your marketing planning information from marketing professionals.
credibility?
Dave Steele 2010-01-05 05:56:55

If your only method of communicating your opinion on this article is to attack the author personally, it is YOUR credibility that is shot, not the authors.

If you would like to point out a factual inaccuracy in the article, be my guest.

And I would also like to take issue with your elitist assertion that us 'simple folks' should take our "economic opinions from economists" etc. I think the regular people of New Brunswick are smart enough to make up our own minds without Irving-sponsored economic/media/environmental/energy 'analysts' telling us what to think.
collreynolds 2010-01-05 12:05:24

I would also like to know if the professor you interviewed for the article you wrote approved the use of the following words? "During a recent conference in Moncton, Mount Allison University professor, Erin Steuter, provided the following account of the marketing strategies that are being used by the government." To say that something IS the marketing plan instead of saying that you SUGGEST THAT IT MAY BE THE PLAN are two vastly different statements.
What is her background? Where did she study? Where has she worked?
collreynolds 2010-01-05 12:13:34

Also, please note, a media expert and a marketing expert are rarely the same thing. Your article would have been stronger if you demonstrated why the person you chose to interview is a media expert. Media relations and media analysis are a function of public relations, not marketing.
RE: Collreynolds
Adam Kelly 2010-01-05 13:09:46

Collreynolds, if her article deserves an F, your comments don't even deserve a grade.

Sorry, I have no intention of continuing on like that. I merely want to point out that, if offering constructive criticism, you probably shouldn't start out by offending someone. It makes them less likely to even consider what you're going to say, and, as an added bonus, makes you sound like a jerk (no offence, but your comments began with a rude tone and slowly shifted away from that).

In your first post you speak of a marketing "expert", which is odd, because the author of the article never does. The professor is a media expert (it even says so in the title), not a marketing expert. Your mistake is not the authors; although, it could be beneficial to clarify that so more readers do not get mistaken.

This does not make her unable to comment on marketing. You do not have to only listen to experts, although they make better witnesses. Steuter may not have many credentials by way of marketing, but that isn't really the point here. This is about techniques in the media.

You're quite right that more background info on Steuter would be beneficial. She is a professor of sociology whose primary research focus is media analysis. I'd say that makes her an expert on analysing things in the media: in this case, marketing techniques (whether intentional or not).

Most of the nine points could use a little more proof, but many people would recognize the techniques and where they have heard them. The techniques are all clearly explained.

Perhaps "strategy" wasn't the best word for Michaud to use in the last sentence of the intro. It implies intention. However, these could be intentional, as they have hired a marketing firm to help them convince the public to support the deal. (Are we seriously using our own money to convince ourselves of something? Really?) Despite that, these are marketing techniques which have appeared, whether intentional or not.

I've seen all nine of these things first-hand in New Brunswick popular media. Being aware of them definitely has merit. This article does not show much about the negotiations themselves (and never claims to), but it does effectively outline nine fallacies that have been presented in favour of selling NBPower. It's about media awareness from a media expert. It's a good and informative article with very few areas for improvement.
collreynolds 2010-01-05 14:01:14

Thank you for taking the time to email me back about my comments. I really appreciate it.

I realize that Julie is only the author of the piece, however I still have some strong objections to publishing work like this. The effort to ensure each point is supported is the responsibility of the writer and the editor. Erin should at least be concerned that her words are taken in the context they intended. Did Erin not offer any examples to support her points which Julie could have incorporated into her article?

I find it incredibly hard to believe that a person who specializes in media analysis would make a statement that they are revealing THE marketing plan and not just their opinions about what they perceive is the marketing plan. I have been a writer for several years and I would not write an unsupported piece unless I clearly stated that it was an opinion piece.

In essence, what Julie is guilty of is the exact same thing that she is says that the Province has done. She is trying to prove that the Province is responsible for making false, unsupported statements by making her own false, unsupported statements. She also offers no critical thought of her own on the subject.

I hope everyone involved will take some time to re-think their approach and be more concerned with the quality of their work.

Thank you for listening
Selling
Alex Corey 2010-01-05 07:10:08

Points number 5 and 9, "The false analogy", and "The false crisis" are themes expanded on in Dr. Thom Workman's (1996) book, "Banking on deception: The Discourse of Fiscal Crisis," available from Fernwood Publishers.

Reading the comments of Colleen Reynolds, I am reminded of a quote from Political Economists Baran and Sweezy I read in, "The Sales Effort and Monopoly Capital," by media analyst Robert McChesney (Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Inger Stole (Inger L. Stole is associate professor of communication at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) and John Bellamy Foster (Sociology Professor at University of Oregon). Available online: http://monthlyreview.org/090406-mcchesney-foster-stole-holleman.php


"“The greatest damage done by advertising,” Baran and Sweezy wrote,

…is precisely that it incessantly demonstrates the prostitution of men and women who lend their intellects, their voices, their artistic skills to purposes in which they themselves do not believe, and that it teaches “the essential meaninglessness of all creations of the mind: words, images, and ideas.” The real danger from advertising is that it helps to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious non-material possessions: the confidence in the existence of meaningful purposes of human activity and the respect for the integrity of [humanity]."
Walker 2010-01-05 15:50:40

It goes without saying that the discussion of NB Power is occurring in a "fact poor" environment. The most glaring omission being that the value of the assets are not public knowledge.

This should not surprise us however because the public is simply irrelevant. Actually, the public is a sort of irritant which is stubbornly interfering with official objectives. The public is acting similar to the parents who failed to see how Kelly Lamrock's gutting of french immersion would enhance the learning of French.

I do need to respond to Colleen's assertion that one should "take" their opinions from specialists. That is tantamount to aborting one's intelligence completely. As much as it is possible one should sift though the data and work out their opinions for themselves. In the case of NB Power because the economic data is not available to us, criticism must turn towards the data we do have. In this case media analysis.

I would urge Colleen to read Manufacturing Consent if she would like to understand what media analysis looks like in an academic environment. If she does that, then an article such as Julie's won't be so perplexing.
Only registered users can write comments!

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

 

Follow us on Twitter

Follow nbmediacoop on Twitter

Hot topics

 

NB Media Co-op's 1st Annual General Meeting - Sept 11

WHERE: Conserver House, 180 Saint John St.,  Fredericton. Phone/Skype are options for att...

 

Clean Bin Project in Sackville today

The Conservation Council of New Brunswick is hosting a film screening of the Clean Bin Pro...

 

Empowering African Women and Youth on Sept 13

With Farida Simba from Tanzania. Mon., Sept. 13, 7pm at Conserver House, 180 St.John St., ...

 

Local Feastival in Fredericton - Sept 25

homegrown [at] conservationcouncil.ca.

 

Critical Mass bike ride every last Friday of the month

Critical Mass takes place on the last Friday of every month around the world. Take part i...

 

Join the World March of Women in NB

Pour toute autre information ou pour manifester votre intérêt veuillez communiquer avec ...

Donate via Paypal!

Today's weather

Who's Online

We have 22 guests and 2 members online