• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home *Opinion*

What’s in the AECL-NB Power Lepreau refurbishment contract?

by Janice Harvey
January 13, 2010
Reading Time: 3min read
Remove radioactive heavy water from Point Lepreau reactor: groups

Power lines near the Point Lepreau nuclear generating station, visible in the background on the top left. Photo from Wikimedia Commons.

Premier Graham is threatening to sue the federal government for the cost of replacement power at Lepreau over the estimated 16-month delay in the reactor overhaul. One can’t help but wonder if this latest saber-rattling is another Hill and Knowlton tactic to position the Premier as the great defender of New Brunswick ratepayers in the midst of the NB Power sale public relations disaster.

If Mr. Graham wants to be taken seriously in his gambit to strong arm the feds into underwriting provincial losses on Lepreau, then he should put the actual contract on the table for all to see. What exactly did NB Power agree to? How was the risk of cost-overruns to be shared? What happens if the reactor doesn’t work, or work well, with its new facelift? Is there an end point at which the cost overruns become so enormous whole enterprise is abandoned?

These questions are important, not just because of the cost of replacement power, but also because Lepreau is the lynchpin of the deal with Hydro-Quebec. According to the MOU, HQ will stop charging NB Power for replacement power this April, once the deal is signed.  If that’s the case, then the rising cost of replacement power is HQ’s problem, not New Brunswick’s. Shouldn’t HQ be the party knocking on the federal government’s door for a bail-out?

One can only speculate on this without seeing the terms of the AECL contract, and without knowing the behind-closed-doors discussions with HQ on Lepreau. We know, however, that if there are problems with Lepreau, the second cheque from HQ doesn’t materialize and the purported benefits of the NB Power sale evaporate. And while all the nuclear enthusiasts are positive that Lepreau will live again, presumably there is a limit to HQ’s willingness to wait around for the resurrection.

The MOU deadline is March 31, 2011 for the transfer of ownership of Lepreau. What if it isn’t ready by then? The retubing is already behind schedule. How long is HQ willing to provide free replacement power to New Brunswick while waiting for this job to be done? The worst case scenario is that HQ pulls the plug on the Lepreau portion of the deal, taking all our profitable infrastructure and ending the provision of free replacement power. We would be left with a limping nuclear white elephant and no way to pay for it.

The only hedge Mr. Graham would have against such eventuality would be to extract a commitment from the federal government to cover Lepreau replacement power costs in order to limit HQ’s financial exposure. That might keep HQ at the table awhile longer.  The other factor is liability for a poorly running reactor after it is relicensed and transferred to HQ. Is HQ looking for some protection there? Are they expecting New Brunswick to extract from the feds some kind of guarantee to expedite the final hand-over? What does the NB Power – AECL contract say about that?

Based on expert testimony, the Public Utilities Board recommended against the Lepreau refurbishment because of the high likelihood of financial disaster. Yet the Conservative government of the day, cheered on by the Graham-led opposition Liberals, went ahead anyway. With this history, it is hard to imagine a judge ruling that an unknowing New Brunswick was blindsided by an incompetent AECL. The evidence to the contrary is all there in the PUB transcripts. What isn’t on the record is the actual NB Power – AECL contract on which much more hinges than just a retrofit project over-time and over-budget.

Because the government refuses to release the AECL contract, we have no idea how credible the Premier’s threatened legal action is, or how it will influence the New Brunswick-Quebec contract. Without the AECL contract, the Ganong committee studying the deal is in the dark. Such secrecy does not bode well for the bigger deal now being negotiated. Without full disclosure, politicians can say anything for political advantage while dodging accountability for the actual terms of the deal.

Janice Harvey is a freelance columnist, university lecturer and president of the New Brunswick Green Party.  She can be reached by email at waweig[at]xplornet[dot]ca.

Tags: AECLJanice HarveyLepreauNB PowernuclearShawn Graham
ShareTweetSend

Related Posts

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Climate change

COMMENTARY: Shouldn’t a new and experimental nuclear reactor for New Brunswick deserve a federal impact assessment?

January 16, 2023

The federal minister of Environment and Climate Change has chosen to ignore public concerns about a small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) for New Brunswick, favouring the nuclear industry and weakening oversight...

Indigenous groups challenge New Brunswick’s costly radioactive waste legacy
Climate change

COMMENTARY: No legitimate reason to support the controversial nuclear technology planned for New Brunswick

November 26, 2022

NB Power plans to develop new nuclear reactors at Point Lepreau that will use a controversial technology with implications for...

COMMENTARY: Pull the plug on nuclear subsidies
Climate change

COMMENTARY: Pull the plug on nuclear subsidies

November 10, 2022

The $970 million just announced by federal natural resources minister Jonathan Wilkinson to build a new reactor at the Darlington nuclear site...

Remove radioactive heavy water from Point Lepreau reactor: groups
Environment

COMMENTARY: UNB’s commitment to nuclear contradicts alleged support for Truth and Reconciliation

October 28, 2022

By researching nuclear technologies, accepting funding from private industry and the state, and publicly advocating in favour of nuclear expansion,...

Load More

Recommended

Angry overflow crowd confronts education minister over French immersion reforms [audio]

Angry overflow crowd confronts education minister over French immersion reforms [audio]

4 days ago
Higgs’ French immersion reforms rejected at Fredericton public consultation 

Higgs’ French immersion reforms rejected at Fredericton public consultation 

2 days ago
A Train in the Night that shoulda never been there: Seeking justice for Lac-Mégantic

A Train in the Night that shoulda never been there: Seeking justice for Lac-Mégantic

13 hours ago
‘Scab-friendly’ bill is Higgs’ latest attack on labour rights: unions, opposition MLAs

Bargaining Forward: CUPE, NB Media Co-op document historic 2021 strike in new book

13 hours ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In