• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Saturday, January 28, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home *Opinion*

A nuclear wake-up call

by Janice Harvey
March 17, 2011
Reading Time: 3min read
Reflections on Japan’s nuclear disaster

Map of Minamisoma City and its location within So-so District Fukushima with air dose rate.jpg

How should we think about the situation in Japan?

One can’t imagine the scale of personal and physical devastation visited by the earthquake and tsunami, both natural disasters which, while predicted, cannot be controlled. The unfolding nuclear disaster is different. It is a man-made event, set in play by the decision to build the nuclear plants in the first place.

If the world is lucky, the worst case scenario – a complete core meltdown and breach of containment in one or more reactors – will be avoided. But it will be done so by the physical, mental, and perhaps mortal sacrifice of the core group of plant operators left behind to try to avert total catastrophe.

When such things happen, I can’t help but wish accountability on those responsible. I don’t mean punishment, just an admission of mistakes made and an appeal for redemption – a sort of truth and reconciliation process.

Japan didn’t have to build nuclear plants, just as New Brunswick didn’t. In situations like this, no rationalization sounds plausible, especially “it was better than the alternatives.” No, it wasn’t, and it isn’t.

None of the alternatives have the potential to contaminate virtually for all time vast tracts of land and to deliver sub-lethal and chronically debilitating doses of radiation to millions within the range of the plume which, as we know from Chernobyl, can travel on high air masses halfway across the world. None of the alternatives produce lethally toxic and radioactive wastes that must be isolated from nature for much longer than human civilizations have yet existed.

Even in the face of yet another demonstration of the destructive power of atom-splitting, however, our arrogance knows no bounds. Officials at Point Lepreau calmly say that our nuclear plant is built to withstand a 6.4 magnitude quake right underneath the plant, and that there are back-up systems after back-up systems designed to prevent any release of radiation in the event of an accident. As if the Japanese plants were not designed to withstand earthquakes – of course they were! – and did not have back-up safety systems – of course they did!

As media reports attest, Japan is a highly developed country, the most technologically savvy and best prepared nation in the world to cope with disasters. No nuclear plant contingency plan assumes the failure of all back-up systems, such as we now see in Japan.

Never believe assurances that a major radioactive release could not happen at Point Lepreau. Nothing in the design, the construction, the workforce or the combination of the three can guarantee public safety.

Nuclear plant designers don’t deal in safety, they deal in risk. They can lower the risk, but they can’t make it zero. At some point, a cost-benefit analysis kicks in as the cost per unit of risk lowering becomes too high to justify (it gets beyond the customer’s “willingness to pay”). So some level of risk above zero is settled upon.

Such an approach, touted as rational and scientific, is nothing more than a game of chance. You roll the dice and hope that something doesn’t happen that you didn’t imagine or plan for, that every piece of technology and equipment works as it is supposed to, and that nobody makes a mistake at a critical point.

While the probability of a major accident may be low, the fact that we have an emergency evacuation plan and a stockpile of thyroid-blocking iodine tablets to distribute for the communities around Lepreau (but not Saint John, even though the city is within a reasonable evacuation range) is a overt concession to the possibility of it happening. That concession is nothing less than a political statement by successive premiers since Richard Hatfield that they are willing to permanently contaminate a large chunk of southern New Brunswick and deliver potentially lethal and certainly sub-lethal doses of radiation to every man, woman and child in the path of the plume, whether in this province, P.E.I., Nova Scotia or Maine (depending on the wind direction). And for what? To generate 100 degrees C of heat to boil water to make steam to run a generator to produce electricity.

Every operating nuclear plant has within it the possibility of catastrophe, bar none. People ignore this risk until it happens. The minute it does, it is too late. The clock cannot be turned back; the nuclear genie cannot be put back in the bottle.

The only way to guarantee there will never be a nuclear accident at Point Lepreau is to turn the refurbishment into a permanent decommissioning project – keep the jobs, just change what they are doing. It has to be done at some point; it might as well be now.

Janice Harvey is a freelance columnist and PhD candidate at UNB.

Tags: ChernobylJanice HarveyJapanLepreaunuclear
Share35TweetSend

Related Posts

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Climate change

COMMENTARY: Shouldn’t a new and experimental nuclear reactor for New Brunswick deserve a federal impact assessment?

January 16, 2023

The federal minister of Environment and Climate Change has chosen to ignore public concerns about a small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) for New Brunswick, favouring the nuclear industry and weakening oversight...

Indigenous groups challenge New Brunswick’s costly radioactive waste legacy
Climate change

COMMENTARY: No legitimate reason to support the controversial nuclear technology planned for New Brunswick

November 26, 2022

NB Power plans to develop new nuclear reactors at Point Lepreau that will use a controversial technology with implications for...

COMMENTARY: Pull the plug on nuclear subsidies
Climate change

COMMENTARY: Pull the plug on nuclear subsidies

November 10, 2022

The $970 million just announced by federal natural resources minister Jonathan Wilkinson to build a new reactor at the Darlington nuclear site...

Remove radioactive heavy water from Point Lepreau reactor: groups
Environment

COMMENTARY: UNB’s commitment to nuclear contradicts alleged support for Truth and Reconciliation

October 28, 2022

By researching nuclear technologies, accepting funding from private industry and the state, and publicly advocating in favour of nuclear expansion,...

Load More

Recommended

Angry overflow crowd confronts education minister over French immersion reforms [audio]

Angry overflow crowd confronts education minister over French immersion reforms [audio]

4 days ago
‘Scab-friendly’ bill is Higgs’ latest attack on labour rights: unions, opposition MLAs

Bargaining Forward: CUPE, NB Media Co-op document historic 2021 strike in new book

13 hours ago
Small modular nuclear reactors are unsafe: CRED-NB [video] 

Small modular nuclear reactors are unsafe: CRED-NB [video] 

2 days ago
A Train in the Night that shoulda never been there: Seeking justice for Lac-Mégantic

A Train in the Night that shoulda never been there: Seeking justice for Lac-Mégantic

13 hours ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In