• About
  • Join the Co-op / Donate
  • Contact
Thursday, May 22, 2025
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home *Opinion*

Penniac Anti-Shale-Gas Organization renews call for shale gas ban

by Armand A. Paul
July 10, 2011
Reading Time: 3min read
shalegasno

shalegasnoThe Penniac Anti-Shale Gas Organization is one of the 11 groups still working for a ban on shale gas activity in New Brunswick. Armand Paul with the Penniac Anti-Shale Gas Organization responds below to comments of approval for the industry made by Bethany Thorne-Dykstra with the Citizens for Responsible Resource Development at a media conference with Bruce Northrup, the Minister of Natural Resources, on July 6, 2011.

Like many others, we in the Penniac Anti-Shale-Gas Organization are both surprised and mystified by the sudden reversal of position by the president of Citizens for Responsible Resource Development. We understand that the group’s constitution includes a call for a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing until there is scientific proof that it is not harmful.

All the scientific evidence so far available indicates that fracking is very dangerous, so this new stand seems to be directly contrary to the group’s official constitution. No wonder there’s so much speculation about what might have motivated such a sea change in that group’s objectives.

In our opinion, the government’s announcement of new regulations changes very little. Nobody would trust the results if the gas companies get to conduct the baseline well testing. That should be done by independent labs, and simply paid for by the gas companies.

Having the gas companies disclose which poisonous and carcinogenic chemicals they plan to use is pointless, unless the government does some research and tells the companies what chemicals they can and cannot use. There’s nothing like that indicated in the new regulations.

And a security bond for compensating property owners is a pretty clear acknowledgement that our government fully understands that therewill be problems, and property owners will experience damage and loss.

Finally, the promise to pay a share of royalties to communities and land owners who agree to have wells on their property is a transparent attempt to buy support for a dangerous industry that simply cannot be undertaken without causing damage.
The promised regulations do not even address the detrimental effects that are guaranteed to occur in New Brunswick, as they have everywhere the shale gas industry has touched:
·     Industrialization of the landscape, with wellheads, pipelines and storage tanks popping up wherever there’s a well;
·      Increased industrial traffic, with more than a thousand tanker trucks of potable water rolling in for fracking every well;
·     Trucking and storage of dangerous chemicals at every well site, and there could be as many as 5,000 wells in our province;
·     24-hour-a-day noise during the fracking process from compressors that sound like a roaring jet engine.

As for the accusation of special-interest groups frightening people with information about what the shale gas industry has done elsewhere, that much is true. Groups such as the Conservation Council of New Brunswick and the many anti-shale-gas community groups have been giving people real information, and it is very frightening. The “special interest” of these groups is the health and well-being of all New Brunswickers, and the protection of their homes, property and water supplies. If that’s fear-mongering, I guess we’re guilty.

The Penniac Anti-Shale-Gas Organization continues to call for an outright ban of the shale gas industry in New Brunswick, because we believe that the risks it presents are too great, and inescapable. We will continue to tell our neighbours about what could happen to all of us if this dangerous industry is allowed to develop here.

Tags: CCNBConservation Council NBfracking
Send

Related Posts

New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance backs federal carbon pricing at Alberta’s top court
Environment

It’s time: make the fracking moratorium permanent

September 30, 2024

This election marks the tenth anniversary of the 2014 election, when voters turfed the Progressive Conservative government of the day,...

Doctors warn of fracking’s ‘unacceptable health risks.’ Where do the political parties stand? [video]
Environment

Doctors warn of fracking’s ‘unacceptable health risks.’ Where do the political parties stand? [video]

September 30, 2024

A group of doctors and other health professionals says the province should put in place a permanent ban on fracking,...

New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance backs federal carbon pricing at Alberta’s top court
Climate change

Premier’s pursuit of shale gas is perverse

February 2, 2024

Premier Blaine Higgs’ continuing desire to exploit shale gas and LNG can only be described as “perverse,” which the dictionary...

A group of land defenders on a rural highway.
Environment

Ten years since RCMP raided anti-fracking camp near Elsipogtog

October 17, 2023

Ten years ago, on October 17, 2013, a heavily militarized intervention took place near Elpsipogtog, where peaceful land defenders were...

Load More

Recommended

Activists gather to oppose billionaire, corporate power: ‘You’re not alone in feeling this way’ [video]

Activists gather to oppose billionaire, corporate power: ‘You’re not alone in feeling this way’ [video]

5 days ago
Politiques sexistes, résistances féministes! International Women’s Day marked in Fredericton with spirited rally [video]

Appel à tous les militants et champions communautaires : partagez votre vision avec le public !

1 day ago
Auto Draft

No decision on Lorneville industrial park expansion as public hearing continues

3 hours ago
The nuclear divide: Why are women cautious of nuclear energy?

The nuclear divide: Why are women cautious of nuclear energy?

3 days ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join the Co-op / Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join the Co-op / Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

X
Did you like this article? Support the NB Media Co-op! Vous avez aimé cet article ? Soutenez la Coop Média NB !
Join/Donate