• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Friday, January 22, 2021
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Arts & Culture
  • Videos
  • COVID-19
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Arts & Culture
  • Videos
  • COVID-19
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home Environment

Alward government dodging shale gas moratorium

by Jean Louis Deveau
October 26, 2012
3 min read
Alward government dodging shale gas moratorium

Shale gas protest at the N.B. Legislature in March 2012. Photo: Stephanie Merrill.

Shale gas critics in New Brunswick say that two government-commissioned reports released in October are being used to give a green light to the development of an industry that is too risky for the province.

Dr. Eilish Cleary, the province’s Chief Medical Officer, was tasked with examining the potential public health impacts of shale gas development in New Brunswick and making recommendations aimed at preventing or mitigating those impacts.

The Alward government announced in early October that they would not be releasing the study. After public outcry, the Alward government reversed its decision and released the report on Oct. 15.

Stephanie Merrill, CCNB Action’s Shale Gas Alert Coordinator found comfort in Dr. Cleary’s health review: “For the first time in over two years, a government issued report openly acknowledges that the shale gas industry has serious health impacts and those impacts will come to New Brunswick if the industry is allowed to proceed.”

The N.B. College of Family Physicians passed a resolution calling for a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing for shale gas last April. The association, which represents 700 doctors in the province, wants a moratorium put into place until studies are done and it can be shown whether the benefits outweigh the risks.

Shale gas opponents say hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for shale gas is a public health concern because the industry has a track record of leaving behind contaminated drinking water, polluted air and  emotional duress at its sites of operation in Texas, Pennsylvania and Wyoming. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo softened his support for shale gas when he announced last September that fracking in the state would have to wait until a review of the industry’s potential public health impacts was completed.

The industry’s critics point to Penobsquis, a rural community adjacent to Sussex, as a place where the provincial government was not able to adequately regulate industry. The residents and their supporters say getting information from the government that is needed to assess risk for the community is already a gruelling task.

“How can we expect the government in New Brunswick that has and continues to put industry ahead of the people of Penobsquis to protect us from the impacts of shale gas? The Conservation Council is still waiting for information requested from the Department of Environment back in July on air quality in Penobsquis. The Alward government is violating rules of responding to information requests within 30 days,” says Merrill.

Dr. Louis LaPierre, a Professor Emeritus of Biology at the Université de Moncton, was commissioned to hold public meetings and gather public opinions concerning the government’s 116 recommendations for regulating a potential shale gas industry. LaPierre’s report was released on Oct. 15th.

LaPierre noted that there were few comments about the government’s regulations at those meetings. Instead, the public shared their concerns with how shale gas could affect their water, health and environment. Shale gas opponents are criticizing the conclusions of LaPierre’s report, which they say are not derived from the data received.

“Dr. Cleary and Dr. LaPierre did not have the mandate to give the green light to shale gas, as seems to be reflected by government and media. Both reports support what the opposition has been saying,” says Merrill. “New Brunswickers have been saying the risks are big and we aren’t willing to assume them. Dr. LaPierre reports this as he heard it in the government-supported tour last summer and Dr. Cleary substantiates those risks, at least with respect to public health.”

About 20 community groups from across the province released a statement on Oct. 19th suggesting that LaPierre’s recommendations and conclusions were based on opinion, not science.

Meaningful public consultation is another concern of the shale gas critics. The critics say that the handful of meetings chaired by LaPierre did not include the cities of New Brunswick or communities that could be most affected by the development of a shale gas sector.

“MLAs should hold meaningful public consultations on whether to allow or not allow shale gas development in New Brunswick. This consultation should start with legislative hearings, and later include public meetings on the government’s final recommendations,” says Dr. Caroline Lubbe-D’Arcy, a Fredericton dentist and active opponent to shale gas.

Shale gas opponents have noted that the Alward Conservatives criticized the previous Graham Liberal government for its lack of public consultation on the proposed sale of NB Power.

“The Alward government is guilty of the same undemocratic actions of forcing a decision on New Brunswickers that based on all the evidence collected could very well harm us in the future,” says Dr. Lubbe-D’Arcy.

Dr. Jean Louis Deveau is a social scientist with the Fredericton Chapter of the Council of Canadians.

Tags: Caroline Lubbe D'ArcyCCNBConservation Council NBCouncil of CanadiansfrackingJean Louis Deveaushale gasStephanie Merrill
ShareTweetSend

Related Posts

When drones guard the pipeline
*Opinion*

RCMP shrugs off findings it acted illegally at Rexton raid on anti-shale gas protesters

November 18, 2020

The RCMP is refusing to accept several findings made by the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission on the RCMP response...

No satisfaction: Chief Tremblay calls emergency Wabanaki Confederacy meeting
*Opinion*

No satisfaction: Chief Tremblay calls emergency Wabanaki Confederacy meeting

November 17, 2020

The Wabanaki Confederacy meeting will be held online, through the videoconference platform Zoom, on the afternoons of Saturday, Nov. 21...

Judge’s ruling in New Brunswick breaks Treaty of 1725
*Opinion*

Judge’s ruling in New Brunswick breaks Treaty of 1725

September 24, 2020

A September 2019 ruling by a judge about a snowmobile grooming hub in New Brunswick contravenes the Treaty of 1725....

Win! Judge overturns Alton Gas approval
*Opinion*

Win! Judge overturns Alton Gas approval

March 28, 2020

Finally, some good news! After six years of Mi’kmaq-led resistance to the Alton Gas natural gas storage project, yesterday marked...

Load More

Recommended

Local governments in Kent County asked to support protecting the land, air and water

Local governments in Kent County asked to support protecting the land, air and water

5 years ago
Coloniality of Coronavirus [video]

Coloniality of Coronavirus [video]

8 months ago

Skiginoweekog (NB land) still in legal limbo

10 years ago

Workers strike in Belledune over safety position

2 years ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In