• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Arts & Culture
  • Videos
  • COVID-19
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Arts & Culture
  • Videos
  • COVID-19
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home *Opinion*

Harper to workers: don’t worry, be happy about EI changes

by Jean-Claude Basque
April 11, 2013
3 min read

After nearly one year of waiting, I was, like thousands of households, very happy to receive a personal letter from our Federal Government explaining changes to the Employment Insurance Program.

I told myself that after all that time, I would finally get real facts and data on why these changes were necessary. After reading the unsigned double-side page (Page 1, Page 2) which looks more like a bland photocopy (no colour for us, just black and white), I was really disappointed with the content. The letter pretends to provide the facts about the changes. The front side has the same information than the back side, but in bullet form this time. What a very interesting new concept of public communication!

The first bullet point tells us that the changes made are only new definitions of terms. I am sorry but creating three distinct categories of unemployed workers (long-tenure, frequent and occasional), where there were none before, and attaching different criteria for each one is quite a drastic change and not simply a new definition of terms.

The second bullet point says that we will not be worse off financially and personal circumstances will be taken into account. I would like to understand how, by having to accept 30% less revenue, I am going to be better off? As for taking personal circumstances into account, how can it be so when Service Canada’s own document states that claimants who have not made arrangements to free themselves of family obligations or other personal responsibilities to allow them to seek and accept all available hours of work may not be able to prove that they are available for work.

The third bullet point goes on to say that if one is not satisfied when he or she has been cut off, that person has the right to appeal. Great! But wait…! The 65 year-old EI Board of Referees has just been disbanded and replaced by a Tribunal. Great name, heh! The former non-bureaucratic system, based on part-time members from labour and employers (who are by the way funding the program), has been replaced by full-time government nominees paid between $90,800 and $107,900 a year. The decisions formerly taken by a three-member board will now be taken by one member only. The five New Brunswick regional boards will disappear. It will now be also almost impossible to defend your case in person.

The fourth bullet point specifies that EI will continue to be there, as always, as long as people make reasonable efforts to get a job. This is supposed to be reassuring. Reasonable efforts actually mean “accepting any kind of job, at all kinds of working hours, ensuring arrangements for family obligations such as childcare and eldercare are possible, taking care of travel accommodations, etc.” These efforts are demanded in order to be able to accept any work that is available.

The fifth bullet point states that nobody will be forced to move to find a job. Of course not, nobody will have to move! But, if you are forced to accept a job situated at a long distance from your family, perhaps you will be forced to move to keep your family together.

Finally, the sixth bullet point reassures Canadians that Service Canada is there for them. Nice to know!

There are four issues which the letter from Service Canada does not mention.

First, the letter is silent about the modifications made to the “Best 14 Weeks Pilot Project,” which will have a negative financial impact on claimants living in the 25 regions in Canada.

Secondly, the abolition of the “Extended Five Weeks of Benefits Pilot Project” for 21 regions is not mentioned. This program was preventing the Spring Black Hole–when seasonal agricultural, fishing and tourism sectors wind down and workers are forced to turn to EI.

Thirdly, the letter does not address the impact that these so-called “minor changes” will have on many unemployed workers, especially those living in rural Canada and working in seasonal industries.

Finally, of course, there is no mention of the anguish and insecurity which these changes have already created for thousands of workers and their families.

Jean-Claude Basque is with the Common Front for Social Justice.

Tags: common front for social justice
ShareTweetSend

Related Posts

Social justice organizations and CUPE denounce Minister’s letter to the Energy and Utilities Board supporting Irving Oil’s fuel price hike
*Opinion*

Social justice organizations and CUPE denounce Minister’s letter to the Energy and Utilities Board supporting Irving Oil’s fuel price hike

January 21, 2021

Social justice organizations and CUPE New Brunswick are reacting to news that Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland...

Irving-Oil-Refinery-Pete-Johnston
*Opinion*

Common Front opposes Irving Oil’s threat to raise heating costs for New Brunswickers

January 20, 2021

The Common Front for Social Justice New Brunswick opposes in the strongest terms Irving Oil’s pressure campaign to increase the...

The Green’s new rent control bill: will it protect renters in New Brunswick?
Economy

The Green’s new rent control bill: will it protect renters in New Brunswick?

November 22, 2020

The Green Party of New Brunswick has introduced a bill that includes some measures to protect tenants. Housing critics say...

New Brunswick needs to better support social assistance recipients in COVID-19 crisis: Common Front for Social Justice
*Opinion*

What do the New Brunswick political parties promise for low-income workers, people in poverty and women?

September 13, 2020

The New Brunswick Common Front for Social Justice asked all political party leaders to tell us their proposals to help...

Load More

Recommended

Are you living in a food desert in New Brunswick?

Are you living in a food desert in New Brunswick?

7 months ago
Court rules against Edmundston retirees’ claims of pension theft

Court rules against Edmundston retirees’ claims of pension theft

8 years ago
Timer ticking on days of inaction to abortion access as Gallant government takes power in NB

Timer ticking on days of inaction to abortion access as Gallant government takes power in NB

6 years ago

12 more opposed to shale gas arrested as RCMP turn violent on National Aboriginal Day

8 years ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In