• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Tuesday, January 31, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home *Opinion*

NB hands keys to environmental impact review to oil and gas developers

by Inka Milewski
March 30, 2014
Reading Time: 2min read
corridor_resource_annual_report_2005
An explosion from drilling in Penobsquis, NB, is pictured on the Corridor Resources’ 2005 annual report to investors. Corridor is set to refrack wells in Penobsquis, NB.

The New Brunswick Department of Environment introduced a new approach to doing environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for oil and gas development in 2011. They called it a phased approach. And, virtually all aspects of this new approach were for the benefit of industry. The Department’s presentation on the new approach was shameless in saying it would “reduce delays for the project proponent” and the proponent would have the “freedom to explore the study area ” before the province made any decision on the entire project.

This freedom included allowing ground penetrating radar and seismic testing, building temporary access roads and well pads, and conducting test well drilling and fracking. All this activity could take place while a phased EIA review was underway. It begs the question, what environmental impacts are being reviewed while fracking is taking place?

The Department boasts that this phased approach requires oil and gas companies to enter the province’s EIA regulatory process earlier. This is just an administrative detail because nothing prevents companies from doing seismic work, road and well pad building, test drilling and fracking unimpeded by environmental considerations.

As for any details about the proponent’s requirement for water supply and wastewater, those could be “finalized while exploratory drilling is undertaken”. The phased EIA is supposed to improve considerations for cumulative effects. Where in the process do these considerations kick in? Who does the assessing and against what baseline will impacts be measured when monitored?

Stunningly, the Department has put the proponent in charge of collecting and responding to public comments. In response to concerns about the public consultation process, a Department of Environment spokesperson said the public was welcome to contact the company with any questions or concerns they might have (Telegraph Journal, March 5, 2014). Apparently, the province doesn’t want to hear directly from the public .

What kind of public consultation did the company currently “exploring” in the McCully field near Penobsquis do apart from putting an ad in the local newspaper and notices in the area? According to the company’s consultation report , they did door-to-door canvassing and “any and all comments or concerns” were recorded.

Really? Sending people (land agents no less), hired by the company, to go door-to-door and expect them to faithfully record the views of residents is just not credible. This lack of credibility is reflected in the sample comments included in the company’s consultation report. According to their report, 64 homes were visited. The consultation report lists 12 comments, all are positive for the project.

There is nothing open, transparent, thorough, rigorous or credible about the phased EIA process for oil and gas development. The province has taken a hands-off approach to public consultation and has allowed the companies to drive the EIA bus. If the public has any concerns, talk to the bus driver.

More disturbing about the province’s total abdication of its responsibility to protect the environment and the public is the fact that the province had a opportunity to be the first not the worst in incorporating an examination of public health issues into oil and gas development project. For all the government’s hype about their regulatory regime being world class or first class, it clearly ranks as a zero not a hero.

Tags: environmentfrackingNew BrunswickPenobsquisshale gas
ShareTweetSend

Related Posts

New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance backs federal carbon pricing at Alberta’s top court
Climate change

COMMENTARY: COP27 shows Higgs is out of touch with reality

November 29, 2022

New reports from COP27 are useful tools to assess whether Premier Higgs’ natural gas policies reflect current reality. • The Premier...

‘Scrap Bill 25’: Tenants determined to reverse lifting of rent cap [video]
Housing

‘Scrap Bill 25’: Tenants determined to reverse lifting of rent cap [video]

November 28, 2022

Tenants and housing advocates opposed to Bill 25 gathered in front of the New Brunswick legislature on Saturday, November 26,...

New Brunswick does not need a new prison, experts say [video]
New Brunswick

New Brunswick does not need a new prison, experts say [video]

November 7, 2022

The New Brunswick government is facing criticisms over its decision to build a new $32 million prison in the Fredericton...

COMMENTARY: The myth of the free market is causing New Brunswick’s housing crisis
Housing

COMMENTARY: The myth of the free market is causing New Brunswick’s housing crisis

November 6, 2022

New Brunswick’s rent cap is set to end on December 31. The rent cap—which limited rent increases to 3.8 percent...

Load More

Recommended

Hey New Brunswick government, check your carbon tax facts! 

COMMENTARY: With the right support, New Brunswick farmers can play significant role in response to climate crisis

2 days ago
Small modular nuclear reactors are unsafe: CRED-NB [video] 

Small modular nuclear reactors are unsafe: CRED-NB [video] 

5 days ago
A Train in the Night that shoulda never been there: Seeking justice for Lac-Mégantic

A Train in the Night that shoulda never been there: Seeking justice for Lac-Mégantic

3 days ago
IN MEMORIAM: Nell Toussaint: July 14, 1969–January 9, 2023

IN MEMORIAM: Nell Toussaint: July 14, 1969–January 9, 2023

6 days ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In