• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Wednesday, January 27, 2021
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Arts & Culture
  • Videos
  • COVID-19
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Arts & Culture
  • Videos
  • COVID-19
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home Education

Janice Harvey explores the changing eco-political discourse in Canadian media

by Sophie M. Lavoie
February 6, 2018
3 min read

Janice Harvey speaking on the changing eco-political discourse on the Globe and Mail on Feb. 2, 2018 at St. Thomas University in Fredericton. Photo by Matthew Hayes.

Janice Harvey showed the “corporate dominance of political agendas” in her investigation of editorials found in leading Canadian newspaper, something very relevant to New Brunswick politics at a talk to students, professors and community members at St. Thomas University on Feb. 2.

Her talk was titled, “Tracking Legitimacy in Eco-Political Discourse: 50 Years of Eco-Political Discourse in Globe and Mail Editorials.”

Harvey is current Acting Chair in Environment and Society at St. Thomas University, preparing to defend her PhD in Interdisciplinary Studies at UNB. This talk was largely drawn from her PhD dissertation, something not necessarily meant for the larger public, according to Harvey, but which attracted 35 people on a snowy afternoon.

In her approach to this study, Harvey was motivated by speculation on “how to be more effective activists” and her surprise at what she terms as “going backwards” on environmental issues in recent years. She called the seventies and eighties a “remarkable” time for activism. But, during her work at the Conservation Council of New Brunswick, she found herself eventually “fighting battles again that we thought we’d won.” At the same time, scientific evidence was overwhelmingly convincing about the negative effects of climate change but the government was largely inactive. “Because the public was not reacting,” according to Harvey, the Canadian government was getting away with more and more inaction.

She studied the Globe and Mail editorials from 1960 up until 2016. Harvey shared a number of quotes from the newspaper’s editorials, some of them surprising in their pro-environmental tone, especially in the earlier period she studied. However, the tone of the editorials slowly changed to being undeniably anti-environmental. Furthermore, occasionally, Harvey found that clear “climate change denial” percolated from the writing.

Harvey grounded her theoretical work about hegemony in that of Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci. In her theorization, “consent is gained through discourse,” much of which is produced by the elite and must “resonate with the common sense” of the people. Harvey clarified that “hegemonic discourse is not imposed;” “it tries to accommodate the public’s expectations” while creating an acceptance of the ideas of those in power. In turn, she stated, “public discourse shapes what is possible to achieve in addressing environmental degradation.”

Harvey chose to turn to media to see the eco-political discourse because it is “where the official and unofficial discourses are negotiated.” For her, the Globe and Mail is “an establishment newspaper,” a paper of the elites, and has been “influential and very powerful.” In terms of environmental editorials, in Harvey’s research, 1972 was the year with the most editorials while in 2007, the environmental focus shifted to “global warming” and “climate change.”

In the beginning of the period she researched, the Globe and Mail “took on the language of the environmentalists” as it evolved, and this “consistently across nearly three decades.” Between 1987 and 1992, there was a “major shift” with a consistent push toward deregulation, away from what Harvey called a “more communitarian and collective life” and towards increased competition and individualism. In the nineties, there is outright hostility against the environmental movement, “delegitimizing its discourse from previous decades.” Between 1997 and 2002, the Globe and Mail “had to get out of the denial box” because science had proven climate change irrefutably but this position put the newspaper in a problematic ambivalence between the neoliberal discourse and the climate reality. The last fourteen years have been ones of “ambivalence, a real struggle [by the editors] to reconcile the science with the ideology.”

In more recent times, Harvey sensed a release from the ambivalence. For example, the Globe and Mail editors’ comment, on Dec. 1, 2016, that the “Liberals have succeeded in marrying the contradictions, at least rhetorically” in their editorial which read: “It’s possible to meet Canada’s climate change commitments while growing the economy, and even growing the oil industry.” Thus, Harvey stated, “corporate dominance of political agendas has solidified” in a way that it hadn’t in the past.

In answering a question from the public, Harvey said she did not look at the Irving medias’ take on the environment because she knew “there would be no surprises.” However, she was invited to write a column for the Telegraph Journal for years in the mid-nineties, at a time when an editor wanted to “shake things up.” Harvey said she “was the token voice that legitimized the paper,” giving them the opportunity to “pat themselves on the back” for having a dissenting voice.

Sophie Lavoie is an editorial board member of the NB Media Co-op.

Tags: CCNBConservation Council NBenvironmentGlobe and MailJanice Harveymediamedia analysissliderSophie M. Lavoie
ShareTweetSend

Related Posts

“We are caretakers of the land”: Blueberry harvest about more than income
Arts & Culture

“We are caretakers of the land”: Blueberry harvest about more than income

December 2, 2020

Indigenous participants in Maine's blueberry harvest might see the end of a longtime tradition with lasting impacts for Indigenous culture....

Theatre St. Thomas tackles timely play about Chilean refugees
Arts & Culture

Theatre St. Thomas tackles timely play about Chilean refugees

December 1, 2020

A play by a Chilean author who was exiled to Canada in the seventies is still relevant today to confront...

Focus on childcare: Royal Commission on the Status of Women 50 years later
Canada

Focus on childcare: Royal Commission on the Status of Women 50 years later

November 25, 2020

The pandemic could bring long-awaited change for childcare in Canada, according to experts. A panel titled, “50 Years After the...

“Our people will still step up”: Panel reviews treaty rights in light of attacks on Mi’kmaw fishers
Indigenous

“Our people will still step up”: Panel reviews treaty rights in light of attacks on Mi’kmaw fishers

November 23, 2020

Mi'kmaw and Wolastoqiyik scholars say that treaty rights must be respected as Mi'kmaw fishers in Nova Scotia face hostility and...

Load More

Recommended

Myth #1: Clinic 554 is a “private abortion clinic”

Myth #1: Clinic 554 is a “private abortion clinic”

10 months ago
hungercount-en

Food bank use in New Brunswick continues to rise

8 years ago

Activists question premier’s answers on CBC morning show

5 years ago
mahjoub-pressapril2012

Fredericton to rally in support of security certificate detainee Mohammad Mahjoub

9 years ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In