• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

Two new nuclear reactors for New Brunswick with no adequate policy on radioactive waste in place

by Susan O'Donnell and Gordon Edwards
September 9, 2020
Reading Time: 3min read
Two new nuclear reactors for New Brunswick with no adequate policy on radioactive waste in place

"I'm refuelling" image from the campaign opposing the new reactors by the Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New Brunswick

PC leader Blaine Higgs says federal funding to build two new nuclear reactors in New Brunswick is confirmed and will be announced after the election. The province and NB Power have already given $10 million to start the development of the nuclear projects. Liberal leader Kevin Vickers is also supporting the plans to build the new reactors.

The federal funding will go to two foreign companies – from the UK and the US – recently established in Saint John. Since arriving in Canada, both companies have been lobbying the provincial and federal government for the money to build their reactors. The CEO of one company estimated the final cost of its reactor at almost $3 billion.

In the month leading up to the snap election, non-government organizations have written to Natural Resources Minister Seamus O’Regan offering to host a public consultation in New Brunswick on radioactive waste policy.

The matter is urgent because the two new reactors in New Brunswick will each produce new categories of radioactive waste for which there is as yet no explicit provision.

The groups are responding to the Minister’s promise in July to “consult and engage with all Canadians” to develop a socially acceptable policy framework and to formulate a strategy for the long-term management of all categories of radioactive waste.

Last November, a team of experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recommended that Canada improve­ its radioactive waste policy and formulate a national strategy. In February Canada agreed to act on that recommendation.

In May, 100 public interest groups across Canada, including nine in New Brunswick, asked Minister O’Regan to launch a public consultation process and to suspend three current radioactive waste disposal projects until Canada has an acceptable policy in place. The projects in question seem to be inconsistent with existing IAEA guidelines for long-term safety.

But even before the Minister’s department (NRCan) has fully engaged on the radioactive waste file, it has been promoting the development of small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) in Canada.

Indeed, NRCan has prepared an “SMR Action Plan” that anticipates “civil society consultation and engagement” from July to September 2020, and promises to “finalize and print” its Action Plan for new reactors in October.

However the department has not yet reached out to public interest groups that have written to the Minister requesting to be consulted. In fact, the “statement of principles” drafted for the SMR Action Plan specifically excludes involvement in the process by any party that does not agree to endorse NRCan’s commitment to “support the development and deployment of various SMR technologies in Canada, with first units in operation by the late 2020s.”

The new reactors propose to make use of the plutonium contained in the solid used nuclear fuel bundles stored at NB Power’s Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station.

But extracting plutonium from used nuclear fuel is highly controversial, raising international concerns about nuclear weapons proliferation, since plutonium is the primary nuclear explosive in the world’s nuclear arsenals.

Extracting plutonium also requires converting solid high-level waste into a highly corrosive liquid form, complicating the handling and long-term management of the resulting waste. Less than one percent of the used fuel is recuperated for useful purposes.

For public policy, radioactive waste is more of a societal problem than an industry problem. Nuclear wastes will long outlive the nuclear industry that created it and the nuclear regulator that licensed its production.

Because radioactivity cannot be shut off, these wastes will pose a potential danger to the health and safety of future generations and the environment with no discernible finite time horizon. Even low and intermediate level wastes remain hazardous for hundreds of thousands of years, and high-level wastes are known to be radiotoxic for millions of years.

The nuclear industry will seek permission at some point to abandon its radioactive wastes, thereby limiting its future liability. Our nuclear regulator has already said it will comply by granting a “licence to abandon.” But the liability is not thereby eliminated. The wastes may be reconfigured, repackaged and moved from one place to another, but they are not destroyed.

Efforts to destroy a small number of radioactive waste materials by “burning them up” in an “advanced” reactor inevitably creates other radioactive waste materials, many of them more intensely radioactive and some of them longer-lived than the ones that have been “burnt up.”

The Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New Brunswick (CRED-NB) formed in May to oppose the new reactors and advocate for non-nuclear, renewable energy development in future.

Susan O’Donnell is the lead researcher for the RAVEN project at the University of New Brunswick and a member of the NB Media Co-op Editorial Board. Gordon Edwards is the president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility in Montreal.

Tags: Blaine HiggsGordon EdwardsKevin VickersLepreaunuclearnuclear wasteplutoniumSeamus O'Regansmall modular nuclear reactorsSusan O'Donnell
Share432TweetSend

Related Posts

Bargaining Forward: Book co-published by CUPE, NB Media Co-op documents historic 2021 strike [video]
Books

Bargaining Forward: Book co-published by CUPE, NB Media Co-op documents historic 2021 strike [video]

January 27, 2023

A new book co-published by the NB Media Co-op and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) vividly documents the...

COMMENTARY: Front-page newspaper ads missed essential info about Higgs’s true 2022 record
New Brunswick

COMMENTARY: Front-page newspaper ads missed essential info about Higgs’s true 2022 record

January 16, 2023

The end of the year is a time for individuals and governments to take stock. On December 30, our Premier,...

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Climate change

COMMENTARY: Shouldn’t a new and experimental nuclear reactor for New Brunswick deserve a federal impact assessment?

January 16, 2023

The federal minister of Environment and Climate Change has chosen to ignore public concerns about a small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) for New Brunswick, favouring the nuclear industry and weakening oversight...

COMMENTARY: The myth of the free market is causing New Brunswick’s housing crisis
Housing

ANALYSIS: Conservatives went sideways on housing as tenants got organized in 2022

January 3, 2023

Up until 2022, public debate about housing in New Brunswick was dominated by landlords. While tenants made only modest gains...

Load More

Recommended

COMMENTAIRE : Avec le bon soutien, les fermières et fermiers peuvent jouer un rôle important dans l’atténuation et l’adaptation aux changements climatiques

COMMENTAIRE : Avec le bon soutien, les fermières et fermiers peuvent jouer un rôle important dans l’atténuation et l’adaptation aux changements climatiques

6 days ago
COMMENTARY: Canada is one of ‘the biggest gangsters in Haiti’

COMMENTARY: Canada is one of ‘the biggest gangsters in Haiti’

23 hours ago
Un drame familial acadien trouve une pertinence amplifiée

Un drame familial acadien trouve une pertinence amplifiée

4 days ago
Demanding a rent cap feels like Groundhog Day for New Brunswick tenants

Demanding a rent cap feels like Groundhog Day for New Brunswick tenants

1 day ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In