• About
  • Join the Co-op / Donate
  • Contact
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home Environment Climate change

Energy technologies considered for New Brunswick are not clean, timely or affordable

Commentary

by Sam Arnold and Ann McAllister
November 16, 2022
Reading Time: 4min read
Energy technologies considered for New Brunswick are not clean, timely or affordable

Wind, solar and hydro are cheaper, cleaner and more readily available than so-called ‘green’ technologies such as small modular nuclear reactors, write Sam Arnold and Ann McAllister. A wind turbine near Moncton is pictured from below on April 25, 2020. Photo: David Gordon Koch

Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources, mentions “clean energy” and “clean growth” at every opportunity. (Telegraph-Journal, Oct. 14, 2022). The Minister declares that various “critical minerals, clean fuels, hydrogen, non-emitting electricity and transmission, carbon capture and removal …. and nuclear technologies” can be considered “clean fuels,” without defining “clean.”

Premier Blaine Higgs calls talks with the feds “an important initiative that will help New Brunswick align with the federal government on provincial priorities, such as small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) development and hydrogen production.” This commentary focuses on SMRs, hydrogen and the liquified natural gas (LNG) terminal, projects that the Premier has mentioned most often.

SMRs are promoted as “clean energy” without explaining the claim. In reality, the entire nuclear fuel chain creates massive carbon and radioactive footprints from uranium mining and tailings to transporting radioactive wastes over long distances to a still non-existent permanent underground storage facility.

The claim that hydrogen production is “clean” also doesn’t pass scrutiny, as 96 percent is currently made using fossil fuels. Hydrogen’s primary uses are in fertilizer and petroleum refining, yet the climate crisis dictates that we phase out oil without delay and eliminate this market.

Premier Higgs is also interested in developing another energy source that can’t be labelled “clean”: natural gas. Earlier this year, he declared his support for a liquified natural gas (LNG) export terminal in Saint John, even though it could take three to five years to develop and use four to seven times the energy.

What about an LNG gas supply? In the Oct. 25 Speech from the Throne, the Premier mused about lifting the 2014 moratorium on fracking despite ongoing opposition and lack of social license. LNG owner Repsol doubts that local supply would be sufficient to warrant investing in a costly conversion, and Germany needs LNG right now, not years from now.

But the most puzzling aspect of this “clean” energy approach is cost. Construction cost estimates for Canada’s SMRs are staggering: $5 billion (2022) for Saskatchewan and from $1.8 to $2.4 Billion for the Moltex project (2016).  What will they cost in a decade or so? Construction costs of the most advanced SMR in North America, Nuscale, have risen from $3 billion to $6.1 billion in four years and construction hasn’t even started.

Electricity costs from SMRs will also likely be high, despite Minister Wilkinson’s assurances of affordability, “if done right.” The levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) for 2021 from Lazard, a prominent New York financial institution, reports utility-scale wind and solar at $26 to $50 dollars per megawatt hour (MWh), or 2.6 to 5 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh). By contrast, nuclear power comes in at $131 to $204 / MWh or 13 to 20 cents / kWh. Electricity from SMRs will likely cost more, as their smaller size means higher costs per unit of power.

Would “green” hydrogen be any more affordable? Chemical engineer Paul Martin has concluded that producing hydrogen from offshore wind in New Brunswick would be far more expensive due to multiple conversion steps than simply using the electricity directly.

Time is critical for combatting the climate crisis. Amory Lovins, internationally renowned energy analyst, says that carbon, cost and time are the critical factors: we must reduce the most carbon for the least cost in the shortest time. The construction cost escalations and delays of mature nuclear technologies warn us that unproven SMR designs will likely take longer and cost more as engineers work out the technical and safety challenges identified in Vendor Design Reviews by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Association.

In contrast, wind, solar and existing hydro are cheaper, cleaner, and ready to go, reducing our carbon emissions in a few years, not in a decade or two. Costly unproven projects like SMRs and hydrogen commit our money to rising costs and delayed payback.

Minister of Natural Resources Jonathan Wilkinson speaks at the G7 Ministerial Meeting in Halifax on September 20, 2018. Photo: Indrid, Cold, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In energy debates, Indigenous peoples are too often disregarded. Wilkinson’s intention to “create a tailored approach to engagement” raises questions about how this will be done. Indigenous peoples’ rights to environmental protection and “the productive capacity of their lands or territories and resources” in Article 29(1) of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, now Canadian law, implies that Indigenous leaders be at the discussion table from the start.

The climate emergency now upon us is jeopardizing human existence (the result of failure by governments and industries in Canada and other developed countries). We must take responsibility to become stewards of the natural world. To limit climate breakdown, the immediate adoption of the most effective, available and sustainable renewable energy technologies must now be employed. Unfortunately, Minister Wilkinson, Premier Higgs, and the “clean energy” proponents are still not on board, even as devastating wildfires, floods, droughts, and hurricanes become the norm.

According to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, “We are on a pathway to global warming of more than double the 1.5 C limit agreed to in Paris. Government and business leaders are saying one thing but doing another. Simply put, they are lying, and the results will be catastrophic.” (CBC News 4/4/22)

Sam Arnold and Ann McAllister are with the Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New Brunswick (CRED-NB). 

Correction: An earlier version of this story provided an incorrect figure for the cost per kilowatt hour of nuclear power. In fact, the cost is approximately 13 to 20 cents / kWh. This article was updated with the correct information on Thursday, November 17, 2022 at approximately 10:10 p.m. 

Tags: Ann McAllisterBlaine HiggsCoalition for Responsible Energy Development in New BrunswickCRED-NBJonathan WilkinsonMoltexSam Arnold
TweetSend

Related Posts

Pourquoi rendre la maladie mystérieuse ?
Articles en français

Pourquoi rendre la maladie mystérieuse ?

May 13, 2025

C’est fou comme les médias et la science font mauvais ménage, alors que les uns sont certains de se placer...

Labour Update: Postal workers strike; CUPE hopes labour relations improve under Holt [video]
Labour

Labour Update: Postal workers strike; CUPE hopes labour relations improve under Holt [video]

November 15, 2024

The NB Media Co-op presents the latest edition of Labour Update. For this edition of the show, host David Gordon...

Greens disappointed with MLA’s loss but welcome Tory defeat [video]
New Brunswick

Greens disappointed with MLA’s loss but welcome Tory defeat [video]

October 24, 2024

For Green Party supporters and candidates, feelings of disappointment were mixed with relief on election night, as they gathered in...

Politics

Conservative candidate stumbles into intersectionality, gets everything about it completely backwards

October 15, 2024

Trigger Warnings: Mentions of violence, genocide, discrimination, transphobia Reading is a funny thing: the eye is always going to scan...

Load More

Recommended

Redefining the political consensus: Limiting migration is going to make our problems worse

Redefining the political consensus: Limiting migration is going to make our problems worse

5 days ago
Pourquoi rendre la maladie mystérieuse ?

Pourquoi rendre la maladie mystérieuse ?

7 days ago
Activists gather to oppose billionaire, corporate power: ‘You’re not alone in feeling this way’ [video]

Activists gather to oppose billionaire, corporate power: ‘You’re not alone in feeling this way’ [video]

3 days ago
The nuclear divide: Why are women cautious of nuclear energy?

The nuclear divide: Why are women cautious of nuclear energy?

10 hours ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join the Co-op / Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join the Co-op / Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

X
Did you like this article? Support the NB Media Co-op! Vous avez aimé cet article ? Soutenez la Coop Média NB !
Join/Donate