• About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
Friday, June 2, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
The Brief
NB MEDIA CO-OP
Share a story
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
  • Articles en français
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Gender
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Videos
  • NB debrief
No Result
View All Result
NB MEDIA CO-OP
No Result
View All Result
Home New Brunswick

The city of Saint John was not meant to be shared. Are we sharing now?

by Rachel Bryant
April 8, 2021
Reading Time: 6min read
The city of Saint John was not meant to be shared. Are we sharing now?

The Ouangondy, Saint John Harbour Ferry Boat, docking at the Rodney Wharf, West Saint John, New Brunswick, c.1910. Photo from the New Brunswick Museum.

A few weeks ago, I spoke with Julia Wright on CBC’s Information Morning about how the city of Saint John was not meant to be shared. I explained that the 1785 city charter was designed, at least in part, to cut Wabanaki people off from the harbour (in violation of Treaty) and to restrict all the “liberties and privileges of freemen” to “the American and European white inhabitants” of the city.1

On Twitter, my friend Daniel Samson, an historian at Brock, shared this 1797 map of the area that very clearly highlights authorized Black settlement spaces well outside of the city limits. Daniel discusses these exclusions as part of a much larger heritage of systemic racism in the Maritime Provinces, powerfully concluding that “our communities are material legacies of 18th-century strategies of inclusion, denial, and removal.”

Source

You can listen to my discussion with Julia, which engages some of my current research about Saint John, here on the CBC website. In addition to the city charter, I spoke about the Bentley Street portage route and the former Wolastoqey village that is now a fenced-off part of the city Port and a footing for the Harbour Bridge. Before the bridge was constructed in 1968, a ferry bearing the name of the Wolastoqey village — Ouangondy — connected west Saint John with the city’s uptown.

One thing that I didn’t have time to talk about in the radio piece was Fort Frederick. Near the Wolastoqey village site, in front of what is now the Carleton Community Centre, there is a marker for Fort Frederick, a site with its own fraught and complex colonial history. But something that is forgotten in the current commemoration material around that site is that there was a truck house at this location prior to the arrival of the Loyalists.

I like to remember the truck house because it helps me reflect on those agreements that my ancestors made to live in this territory alongside their Wabanaki partners in Treaty. In the Peace and Friendship Treaties, the British promised to establish truck houses in and amongst their settlements where Wabanaki people could freely and easily sell and trade their goods. Continuously facilitating Wabanaki access and economic participation in this way was just one specific condition that the British agreed to – in exchange for the amazing right to live here in this beautiful place at all.

And so a truck house master named John Green was stationed at Fort Frederick to ensure this access and to tend to this one aspect of the Treaty relationship. Tending to this relationship is something that my ancestors decided we didn’t have to do anymore once the Loyalists arrived and gave us a majority status in the region. When I remember that there was a truck house in this location, it helps me assess whether we are, as a city, continuing to operate in violation of those historic agreements — continuing to consolidate ourselves against a space that we are still not willing to share.

Yesterday, the Green Paper on Local Governance Reform was released by the Province of New Brunswick to great interest and fanfare. The document contains one instance of the word “Indigenous” (in a demographics chart) and one instance of the word “treaty” (in a reference to western Canada). And so are we acting as partners or as rulers? Are we ensuring Wabanaki access or economic activity and participation in a manner that is consistent with agreements that were made on our behalf many years before spaces like Saint John were chartered — or are we continuing to ignore our responsibilities under Treaty and to represent the structures of our cities and municipalities, the “material legacies of 18th-century strategies of inclusion, denial, and removal,” as the primary conditions of belonging and participation in this territory?

 

1. The argument that the city charter cut off Wolastoqiyik access to the harbour salmon fishery comes to me, as noted in the radio interview, from Jason Hall, ethnohistorian for the Wolastoqey Nation of New Brunswick.

Rachel Bryant is a settler writer, researcher, and educator. She lives with her family in Menahkwesk/Saint John, which is part of Wolastokuk in the unceded land of the Wabanaki Confederacy. She writes about Menahkwesk/Saint John history on her blog where this piece was first published.

Tags: indigenousLoyalistsMenahkweskOuangondyPeace and Friendship TreatiesRachel BryantSaint Johntreatytruck houseWabanakiWolastoqey
ShareTweetSend

Related Posts

COMMENTARY: Persecuted but resilient: The enduring impacts of police violence for Indigenous New Brunswickers
Indigenous

COMMENTARY: Persecuted but resilient: The enduring impacts of police violence for Indigenous New Brunswickers

June 1, 2023

Policing in Indigenous Canadian communities has strong continuities with the long history of colonization. Innocent Indigenous lives are lost each...

Rough Waters provides space to discuss the past and future impact of the Marshall decisions
Indigenous

Rough Waters provides space to discuss the past and future impact of the Marshall decisions

April 11, 2023

Mount Allison politics professor Dr. Mario Levesque and his co-editors with the Journal of New Brunswick Studies knew they wanted...

Mi’gmaq title initiative in New Brunswick part of larger Land Back movement
Indigenous

Mi’gmaq title initiative in New Brunswick part of larger Land Back movement

March 24, 2023

Last month, eight Mi’gmaq communities in New Brunswick released a statement and a map asserting their jurisdiction in the province....

Kekhimin language school launches documentary [video]
Culture

Kekhimin language school launches documentary [video]

March 7, 2023

A new short documentary showcases the work of Wolastoqey immersion school founder Lisa Perley-Dutcher and her collaborators.  The learning centre,...

Load More

Recommended

COMMUNIQUÉ : Alter Acadie NB préoccupé par les décisions du ministre de l’Éducation sur la diversité sexuelle

STATEMENT: Backlash against 2SLGBTQIA+ people and communities in New Brunswick

6 days ago
COMMENTAIRE : La population Néo-Brunswickoise peine à manger

COMMENTAIRE : La population Néo-Brunswickoise peine à manger

3 days ago
Forest for the trees [audio]

Forest for the trees [audio]

3 days ago
COMMENTARY: Political will required to end poverty, food insecurity in New Brunswick

COMMENTARY: Political will required to end poverty, food insecurity in New Brunswick

4 days ago
NB Media Co-op

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • Calendar
  • Archives

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Join/Donate
  • Contact
  • Share a Story
  • COVID-19
  • Videos
  • New Brunswick
  • Canada
  • World
  • Arts & Culture
  • Environment
  • Indigenous
  • Labour
  • Politics
  • Rural

© 2019 NB Media Co-op. All rights reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In